The following document lists the file tnotes.dat
from catalogue J/AJ/124/100.
Also available:
plain copy of the file
with f77 program to read file
into arrays
or line by line
File is also available in
FITS,
Tab-separated format,
or in HTML.
## (from tabmap V6.0 (2016-08-18)) 2024-04-26T22:30:44 #--------------------------------------------------------------------------- #-- J/AJ/124/100 OH megamasers at z>0.1. III (Darling+, 2002) #-------------------------------------------------------------------------- #---Table: J/AJ/124/100/./tnotes.dat Notes from the tables (36 records) # Note I2 --- Note number # Text A77 --- Text of the note -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No| te|Text --|----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1|Source needs more integration time, because of a suggestive feature in the 1| bandpass. 2|Source needs more integration time, based on L_OH_^pred^<L_OH_^max^. 3|Lu & Freudling (1995, Cat. <J/ApJ/449/527>) list an HI redshift and spectrum 3| with z=0.04714, which is not unambiguous but casts doubt on the PSCz 3| redshift of this source. 4|Galactic HI in bandpass. 5|Possible OH absorption feature, but<~1mJy deep. 6|Radio-quiet IR QSO (Beichman et al., 1986ApJ...308L...1B) 7|Observations were performed during daylight, which increases the rms noise 7| significantly. 8|Possible 23mJy OH emission feature 220km/s redward of the optical redshift. 11|1667MHz OH line undetectable because of Galactic HI. 12|OH undetectable because of RFI. 13|Continuum creates standing waves, making OH undetectable. 14|3C 048. 15|3C 273 16|Continuum source (444mJy; Condon et al., 1998, Cat. <VIII/65>) 82" from this 16| target creates standing waves, making OH undetectable. 17|4C 12.50. 18|3C 459. 21|Listed as an OHM by Baan et al. (1998ApJ...509..633B), but no OH measurements 21| exist in the literature. 22|No spectrum of this OHM is available in the literature 23|OH kilomaser 24|Baan et al. (1998ApJ...509..633B) measure z=0.0097 for this object, which 24| differs by 3900km/s from the OH detection at z=0.0023 (Henkel & Wilson, 24| 1990A&A...229..431H). Since the peak OH line is only 3mJy, the validity of 24| this OH detection is suspect. 25|Bottinelli et al. (1990IAUC.4977Q....B) quote a distance of 375Mpc in their 25| detection announcement, but the luminosity distance derived from Grogin & 25| Geller (2000, Cat. <J/AJ/119/32>) is a factor of 4 less, at 94Mpc. 25| Hence, this detection is probably spurious 26|Baan et al. (1992AJ....103..728B) report upper limits on L_OH_ for this OHM 26| that are significantly below published values, making the validity of this 26| OHM suspect. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------